step one. But really, within the genealogy and family history, everyone knowthat for each laws there can be an exemption. An effective vexing area ofgenealogy is the fact no one most understands just how to utilize brand new exceptions orrules with people definitive adjective particularly usually, maybe, most likely,most likely, etcetera. It will be fascinating when the around other instances ofjointures are produced a-year otherwise one or two shortly Tallahassee, FL women personals after a known relationships big date.
dos. Can there be an enthusiastic extant dispensation to the relationships of ElizabethClifford and Sir Ralph Bowes who have been 3rd cousins through Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or last cousins, shortly after taken off the fresh fifth LordClifford? Who would narrow down its relationship date.
Arthur
Presumably, if good dispensation was desired and you may supplied, it would havebeen from the one of several pursuing the, and might appear in the brand new correspondingregister guide, whether or not it survives:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop out-of York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop off Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop off Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop away from Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop regarding Carlisle 1502-1508John Penny, Bishop out of Carlisle 1509-1520
5. Whether your 10th Lord Clifford really does wed during the early 1487 [state January] andhas Age later in that seasons, do the fresh new chronology maybe not functions?
John fingers?
Age produced when you look at the late 1487, Henry born inside the 1488/nine, Joan inside the ,etcetera. filling out the brands of the publish off . If the (a) thechronology nevertheless works; and (b) their matrimony piece wasn’t reasonable; thenwe just have brand new 1505 pedigree away from Henry VII’s which is inside the oppositionto new conjecture you to definitely she try a valid daughter.
six. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: Could be the Clifford daughters the brand new onlyknown Henry VII affairs excluded? Were there others? In this case,won’t one to reflect improperly with this document because the a source?
Out of comparisons You will find produced from new c.1505 Henry VII Relationships pedigreeswith new 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s North pedigrees, which can be
On the c.1505 Affairs pedigrees, this new Clifford youngsters are maybe not listedin an excellent Clifford pedigree, but instead about St. John pedigree. Given that I’mnot accustomed brand new St. John family members, adopting the ‘s the guidance asit looks on the c.1505 pedigree, as the obtained from this new 1834 Coll. Finest. etGen. article. This new phrasing in the quotations is exactly because it looks inthe 1834 article (pp. 310-311).
„Zero. XII.”Away from my personal Lord Welles child, Sir Richard Pole, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess out of Somerset had about three husbands.” By „John Duke ofSomerset” she got „My Lady brand new King’s Mommy.” who had „The new Queen.” whohad „Prince „By „Sir Oliver Saint John, very first spouse.” she had 3 daus & 2 sons:
A great. „Edith, married to help you Geoffrey Rod off Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. „Sir Richard Rod, Knt. married with the Lady Margaret, dau. of theDuke off Clarence.” They had: „Harry. „A2. „Alianor, married so you can Ralph Verney, Esq.” They had: „John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[an alternate child, unnamed].”
B. „John Ssint John, esq.” He had four college students:B1. „Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d „Four daughters and oneson.”B2. „Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” They had „Jane. Mabill.Henry, child and you may heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. „E, married so you can Thomas Kent, Esq. out-of Lincolnshire.”B4. „A good Nun regarding Shaftesbury.”B5. „Oliver Saint John.”
C. „Dame Mary, wedded to help you Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. „Edmond Frognall with his brethren and sistren.” Which have issueindicated, not named.C2. „Age, married so you can Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. „E, married very first into the Lord Zouche; immediately after into LordScrope away from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”Age. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” Having issueindicated but not named.
Margaret Duchess from Somerset, from the „Lionel Lord Welles, last spouse.”had: „John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. away from K. Edward IV.” andthey got „E.”